# AI use cases for Hacker (Elite588/Hacker)

Repo: [Elite588/Hacker](https://github.com/Elite588/Hacker) | Use cases: 5 | Page: https://dedupedai.com/use-cases/elite588-hacker/

Elite588/Hacker is a curated collection of cybersecurity references, scripts, tools, labs, and training material, maintained by Omar Santos as supplemental material for his books, courses, and live training.

This file holds every use case of this repo. Each one starts with a "## " heading and ends with its URL.

- Find vetted AI security references for an LLM review: https://dedupedai.com/use-cases/elite588-hacker/find-ai-security-references-for-llm-review/
- Collect AI-assisted incident response resources: https://dedupedai.com/use-cases/elite588-hacker/pick-ai-assisted-incident-response-resources/
- Plan a security certification path from roadmaps: https://dedupedai.com/use-cases/elite588-hacker/plan-cert-path-from-roadmaps/
- Build a home cyber range for security practice: https://dedupedai.com/use-cases/elite588-hacker/build-home-cyber-range-for-practice/
- Map a security program to the domain taxonomy: https://dedupedai.com/use-cases/elite588-hacker/map-security-program-to-domain-taxonomy/

## How to find vetted AI security references for an LLM review with Hacker

Repo: [Elite588/Hacker](https://github.com/Elite588/Hacker) | Difficulty: Intermediate | Time: 30 minutes | Basis: From the README

Locate the AI security and LLM engineering references in the ai folder for an app review.

**Who it is for:** An AppSec engineer who has been asked to review a feature that sends user input to a large language model and needs reference material before the review.

**The problem:** Searching the web for AI security guidance returns mixed quality results with no clear structure.

**The outcome:** A short list of AI security and LLM engineering resources from the repo, each with its path and purpose, to use as review references.

### Steps

1. Run `git clone https://github.com/Elite588/Hacker.git` to get a local copy, or browse the repo on GitHub. (inferred, check the README)
2. Open the ai/ folder, which the README says contains AI security and LLM engineering resources.
3. List the files and subfolders that cover AI security.
4. Note each resource path, title, and what it covers.
5. Read the chosen resources and record which review checks they support.

### Prompt to paste into your agent

```text
Using the GitHub repository Elite588/Hacker, open the ai/ folder and list the AI security and LLM engineering resources relevant to reviewing <target LLM application>. Report a table with resource name, path, and one-line purpose. Verify that every path you report exists in the repository tree before including it.
```

### Caveat

The README gives only folder-level descriptions, so the specific files inside ai/ must be opened and checked before you rely on them.

Dual-use notice: only use this on software, sites and systems you own or are authorized to test.

Disclaimer: Third-party repos we don't own or vouch for. AI-generated use cases can be wrong: review everything and run at your own risk. Full text: https://dedupedai.com/disclaimer/

URL: https://dedupedai.com/use-cases/elite588-hacker/find-ai-security-references-for-llm-review/

## How to collect AI-assisted incident response resources with Hacker

Repo: [Elite588/Hacker](https://github.com/Elite588/Hacker) | Difficulty: Intermediate | Time: 30 minutes | Basis: From the README

Pull the AI-assisted incident response and automation material from the ai folder.

**Who it is for:** A DFIR analyst whose team wants to test AI-assisted triage and response automation and needs references first.

**The problem:** Incident response teams have no shared list of AI-assisted response material and must find it one source at a time.

**The outcome:** A team reading list of AI-assisted incident response and automation resources drawn from the repo.

### Steps

1. Run `git clone https://github.com/Elite588/Hacker.git` or open the repo on GitHub. (inferred, check the README)
2. Open the ai/ folder and find the section on AI-assisted incident response and automation.
3. Open the digital forensics and incident response material referenced from the README's domain list.
4. Sort the resources by whether they cover detection, triage, or response.
5. Save the list in your team wiki with the source path for each item.

### Prompt to paste into your agent

```text
Using the repository Elite588/Hacker, find the AI-assisted incident response and automation resources in the ai/ folder and summarize them for a DFIR team evaluating <target workflow>. Output a list with path, resource type, and the response stage it covers. Verify that each path is present in the repository before listing it.
```

### Caveat

The README does not say how current these resources are, so check the date and relevance of each item before using it in production.

Dual-use notice: only use this on software, sites and systems you own or are authorized to test.

Disclaimer: Third-party repos we don't own or vouch for. AI-generated use cases can be wrong: review everything and run at your own risk. Full text: https://dedupedai.com/disclaimer/

URL: https://dedupedai.com/use-cases/elite588-hacker/pick-ai-assisted-incident-response-resources/

## How to plan a security certification path from roadmaps with Hacker

Repo: [Elite588/Hacker](https://github.com/Elite588/Hacker) | Difficulty: Beginner | Time: 15 minutes | Basis: From the README

Compare the certification roadmaps and exam topic lists in the certifications folder.

**Who it is for:** A career switcher or junior security analyst deciding which certification to pursue next and in what order.

**The problem:** Certification options from several bodies are scattered, and it is hard to see which topics each one covers.

**The outcome:** A short ordered plan with one certification, its roadmap link, and the exam topics to study first.

### Steps

1. Open the certifications/ folder in a browser at https://github.com/Elite588/Hacker.
2. Read the roadmap files and note which bodies they cover, such as CompTIA, ISC2, Cisco SCOR, and Kubernetes/CNCF.
3. Open the supplemental exam topics for the certification you are considering.
4. Pick one certification and write down the first three topics to study.
5. Schedule a review after the first study block to confirm the plan still fits your goal.

### Prompt to paste into your agent

```text
Using the GitHub repository Elite588/Hacker, read the certifications/ folder and recommend one certification path for <target career goal>. Output the certification name, its roadmap file path, and the first three exam topics. Verify that each named exam topic appears in the repository files before recommending it.
```

### Caveat

The README groups certification material separately, so the roadmap content must be checked against each issuing body's current exam guide before you book an exam.

Dual-use notice: only use this on software, sites and systems you own or are authorized to test.

Disclaimer: Third-party repos we don't own or vouch for. AI-generated use cases can be wrong: review everything and run at your own risk. Full text: https://dedupedai.com/disclaimer/

URL: https://dedupedai.com/use-cases/elite588-hacker/plan-cert-path-from-roadmaps/

## How to build a home cyber range for security practice with Hacker

Repo: [Elite588/Hacker](https://github.com/Elite588/Hacker) | Difficulty: Advanced | Time: 120 minutes | Basis: From the README

Follow the lab-building resources to set up a practice environment.

**Who it is for:** A student or team lead who wants a private lab to practice security skills without touching production systems.

**The problem:** Setting up a cyber range from scattered guides takes days of searching and guesswork.

**The outcome:** A working practice lab built from the repo's lab-building and training reference material.

### Steps

1. Run `git clone https://github.com/Elite588/Hacker.git` to get the repository locally. (inferred, check the README)
2. Open the build-your-own-lab/ folder and read the lab-building and cyber range resources.
3. Open training-reference/ and use its organized tool indexes to choose the tools for your lab.
4. Check the license and install notes in each tool's own project before installing it.
5. Isolate the lab network from production systems and test one practice exercise.

### Prompt to paste into your agent

```text
Using the repository Elite588/Hacker, read build-your-own-lab/ and training-reference/ and produce a setup plan for a home cyber range for <target skill focus>. Output the tool list with source paths and the isolation steps. Verify that each tool named is listed in the repository before including it.
```

### Caveat

The README does not list specific lab tools, so every tool named in the training reference must be confirmed in its own project before use.

Risk, remote script: The repo includes scripts, so read each script before you run it and run lab tools only on isolated networks.

Dual-use notice: only use this on software, sites and systems you own or are authorized to test.

Disclaimer: Third-party repos we don't own or vouch for. AI-generated use cases can be wrong: review everything and run at your own risk. Full text: https://dedupedai.com/disclaimer/

URL: https://dedupedai.com/use-cases/elite588-hacker/build-home-cyber-range-for-practice/

## How to map a security program to the domain taxonomy with Hacker

Repo: [Elite588/Hacker](https://github.com/Elite588/Hacker) | Difficulty: Intermediate | Time: 45 minutes | Basis: From the README

Use the cybersecurity-domains landing pages to find coverage gaps.

**Who it is for:** A security manager building or reviewing a security program who needs to see which domains are covered and which are missing.

**The problem:** Program reviews often miss whole areas such as cryptography, hardware security, or governance because no structure is in front of the team.

**The outcome:** A gap list that marks each domain in the taxonomy as covered, partly covered, or missing, with linked references.

### Steps

1. Open the cybersecurity-domains/ folder at https://github.com/Elite588/Hacker.
2. List the domains named in the README: fundamentals, offensive, defensive, application, cloud and container, infrastructure and network, cryptography and PKI, hardware and embedded, governance, risk and compliance, and labs.
3. Mark each domain as covered, partly covered, or missing in your program.
4. Open the landing page for each missing domain and pick one starting reference.
5. Record the gaps and assign an owner to each one.

### Prompt to paste into your agent

```text
Using the GitHub repository Elite588/Hacker, read the cybersecurity-domains/ folder and compare its domain list against the controls described in <target security program>. Output a table with domain, coverage status, and one reference path for each missing domain. Verify that every domain name matches the README before reporting it.
```

### Caveat

The taxonomy is a reference structure, not an assessment, so coverage status still depends on your own program review.

Dual-use notice: only use this on software, sites and systems you own or are authorized to test.

Disclaimer: Third-party repos we don't own or vouch for. AI-generated use cases can be wrong: review everything and run at your own risk. Full text: https://dedupedai.com/disclaimer/

URL: https://dedupedai.com/use-cases/elite588-hacker/map-security-program-to-domain-taxonomy/
