Who it is forA developer with one algorithm file and a clear way to measure its output who wants it improved without manual trial and error.
The problemManual rounds of editing one algorithm file and rerunning tests are slow, and gains are hard to attribute.
The outcomeA better version of the algorithm file and its description, with a record of each edit and the evidence for it.
What you need first
- A Python environment (the repo language is Python)
- A system that can run on one eval instance and produce output
- An Evaluator that scores each output from 0 to 1
- Train and validation data that define what good looks like
- Starting tunable artifacts as a directory of files
- A coding-agent Proposer to make the edits (the README says the proposer must be agents)
Steps
- Write a System that runs the algorithm on one eval instance and returns its result.
- Write an Evaluator that scores each result from 0 to 1.
- Prepare train and validation instances that reflect the target task.
- Map the algorithm file and its description into a TunableArtifactSchema as a small two-file directory.
- Start the evolution loop from the current file and review the best candidate when the run ends.
Prompt for your agent
Using the AntOmniEvo repo (ant-research/AntOmniEvo), evolve the single-file algorithm at <file-path> and its description, scored by an Evaluator returning 0 to 1. Expected output: the best candidate's file and description plus its change lineage. Verify that the best candidate's score on the validation instances beats the starting file.
Caveat. The README says the system under optimization need not contain an LLM, but the Proposer must be agents, so plan for agent access even for a simple algorithm.
Get 5 new use cases every morning. Free, one short email, unsubscribe anytime.
Get them freeShare: X LinkedIn Hacker News Email Copy link
Disclaimer
Deduped lists open-source repositories that belong to other people. We do not own, maintain, audit, or vouch for any of them, and a repo appearing here is not an endorsement or a safety check. The use cases, steps, and prompts are written by AI and may be incomplete, outdated, or just wrong. Where a use case is marked "Seen in the wild", we link to public posts where someone described something similar, but we have not verified those posts and the use case itself is still our AI's own write-up. Use all of this at your own risk. Only run code, commands, or agents on systems and accounts you are authorized to use, and read the code and every command before you run it, especially anything that touches credentials, files, or the network. Nothing here is professional, security, legal, or financial advice. All trademarks and project names belong to their respective owners, and their use here does not imply affiliation. Content is provided as is, without warranties of any kind. Found a mistake, a safety problem, or something you want removed? Email [email protected] and we will look at it promptly. Full disclaimer page