Reverse engineering. Matching a category's design language is the goal, so avoid copying distinctive screens or assets from the apps you study.
Who it is forAn app developer whose screen feels off or dated and who wants a concrete redesign grounded in what top apps do.
The problemIt is hard to tell which parts of a screen are weak or what better screens in the same category actually do.
The outcomeA revised screen in code, plus a short explanation of which patterns from the category were applied and why.
What you need first
- An MCP-capable agent such as Claude Code, Cursor, or Codex
- An Appllama account with Pro, since MCP access is part of Pro
- An Expo / React Native project and a simulator for the build loop
Steps
- Run
npx skills@latest add appllama/appllama-skillsfrom your project root. - Connect the Appllama MCP at
https://mcp.appllama.io/mcpand approve it with your Appllama account. - Collect the screen as a screenshot, its code, or a "Copy Screen ID" reference from appllama.io.
- Ask your agent to use the appllama-usage improve-a-screen playbook and the appllama-app-design-skill build bar on that screen.
- Compare the before and after simulator recordings and keep only the changes that hold up next to the category screens.
Prompt for your agent
Using the appllama/appllama-skills repo, take the screen at <screenshot, code path, or Copy Screen ID> and improve it against the top-grossing apps in its category through the Appllama MCP. Output the revised screen code and a list of changed patterns, and verify the result in the simulator before reporting it.
Caveat. The README says the design skill is sharper with the MCP connected, so the research step adds value only when the MCP is set up and credited.
Get 5 new use cases every morning. Free, one short email, unsubscribe anytime.
Get them freeShare: X LinkedIn Hacker News Email Copy link
Disclaimer
Deduped lists open-source repositories that belong to other people. We do not own, maintain, audit, or vouch for any of them, and a repo appearing here is not an endorsement or a safety check. The use cases, steps, and prompts are written by AI and may be incomplete, outdated, or just wrong. Where a use case is marked "Seen in the wild", we link to public posts where someone described something similar, but we have not verified those posts and the use case itself is still our AI's own write-up. Use all of this at your own risk. Only run code, commands, or agents on systems and accounts you are authorized to use, and read the code and every command before you run it, especially anything that touches credentials, files, or the network. Nothing here is professional, security, legal, or financial advice. All trademarks and project names belong to their respective owners, and their use here does not imply affiliation. Content is provided as is, without warranties of any kind. Found a mistake, a safety problem, or something you want removed? Email [email protected] and we will look at it promptly. Full disclaimer page