Who it is forA maintainer who forked Prism Quant or changed its quantization code and needs evidence the core behavior still holds.
The problemAfter editing rotation or quantization code, it is unclear whether the numerical properties the project relies on still hold.
The outcomeA clean pytest run covering the repo's algebra, metadata, loading and generation checks, with the scope documented in docs/validation.md.
What you need first
- Python 3.10 or newer
- A PyTorch installation that matches your CUDA version
- Internet access to clone the repo and download Hugging Face checkpoints
- Enough GPU or system memory for the chosen model size (see docs/models.md)
Steps
- Clone the repo with
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ForeverBlue816/PrismQuant.gitand enter the folder withcd PrismQuant. - Install the development extras with
pip install -e '.[dev]'. - Run
pytest -qand note any failing tests. - Open docs/validation.md to see which numerical checks the tests cover and which they do not.
- Record which of your changes the passing tests do not cover, and add tests for those areas.
Prompt for your agent
Clone https://github.com/ForeverBlue816/PrismQuant, run pip install -e '.[dev]' and then pytest -q. Report the pass and fail counts, then read docs/validation.md and list the areas of <changed_module> that the tests do not cover.
Caveat. Passing the release tests shows the packaged checks hold, not that a modified kernel or new model is accurate on the paper's benchmarks.
Use this in your AI agent
Ask your agent
Using the Deduped MCP, get the setup steps for ForeverBlue816/PrismQuant and "Check a Prism Quant fork with the release test suite"
Add Deduped to Claude Code once
claude mcp add --transport http deduped https://dedupedai.com/mcp
Every Monday: the 5 hottest repos and exactly how to use them. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe anytime.
Get them freeShare: X LinkedIn Hacker News Email Copy link
Third-party repos we don't own. AI-written use cases can be wrong. Disclaimer