DEDUPED Hot AI repos, turned into use cases Get 5 a day

How to find PRD gaps and conflicts before anyone writes code with Codexqa

Get one P0/P1 register of gaps and conflicts from a PRD, with verification steps.

Who it is forA product owner or QA lead who has a PRD or story pack and wants it checked before development starts.

The problemGaps and conflicts in requirements cause failed tests later, and they are cheapest to fix before code exists.

The outcomeA single assignable P0/P1 gap-and-conflict register, where high-priority items include executable verification steps.

What you need first

  • One of Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, or OpenClaw installed
  • A local git repository with the branch to check (the README refers to origin/main)
  • Node.js with npx available (inferred from the npx install commands)
  • For browser replay: Playwright Chromium, as named in the README

Steps

  1. Install the requirement analyzer with npx skills add openqa-cn/codexqa --skill codexqa-requirement-analyzer.
  2. Place the PRD or story pack in the repository or paste it into the agent session.
  3. Run the agent prompt below.
  4. Assign the P0 and P1 rows to the owners named in your team process.

Prompt for your agent

Use codexqa-requirement-analyzer on the PRD at <prd-path>. Produce one P0/P1 gap-and-conflict register, with preconditions, stimulus, expected result, and evidence for each high-priority row. Verify that every high-priority row has an executable verification step.

Caveat. The README describes the register format but does not show a sample PRD, so the quality of gap detection on your own document is unverified until you run it.

Share: X LinkedIn Hacker News Email Copy link

Disclaimer

Deduped lists open-source repositories that belong to other people. We do not own, maintain, audit, or vouch for any of them, and a repo appearing here is not an endorsement or a safety check. The use cases, steps, and prompts are written by AI and may be incomplete, outdated, or just wrong. Where a use case is marked "Seen in the wild", we link to public posts where someone described something similar, but we have not verified those posts and the use case itself is still our AI's own write-up. Use all of this at your own risk. Only run code, commands, or agents on systems and accounts you are authorized to use, and read the code and every command before you run it, especially anything that touches credentials, files, or the network. Nothing here is professional, security, legal, or financial advice. All trademarks and project names belong to their respective owners, and their use here does not imply affiliation. Content is provided as is, without warranties of any kind. Found a mistake, a safety problem, or something you want removed? Email [email protected] and we will look at it promptly. Full disclaimer page