Who it is forA product lead or analyst choosing which planner model to evaluate further for a mobile task automation product.
The problemA single overall score hides differences in tool use, memory, Skills, and sub-agent coordination.
The outcomeA shortlist of systems ranked by the category that matters for your use case, with the cost caveat noted.
What you need first
- A web browser to open the project website and the arXiv page
- A BibTeX file or reference manager if you plan to cite the paper
Steps
- Open the Performance section of the README in the Tongyi-MAI/Qwen-Planner-Agent repository.
- Compare the Overall column with the Tool Use, Memory, Skills, and Sub-agent columns for the systems you care about.
- Read the footnote that says cost covers output tokens only, excluding input tokens, external tool charges, device execution, and extra Harness processing.
- Record the systems that lead in your priority category and mark them for a separate evaluation.
Prompt for your agent
Read the Performance table in the README of the Tongyi-MAI/Qwen-Planner-Agent repository and produce a ranked list of systems for <priority category: Tool Use, Memory, Skills, or Sub-agent>. Expected output: a table with system name, the priority score, and the Overall score. Verify that the scores match the README values and that you state the cost exclusions.
Caveat. The scores are the authors' reported results on MobilePA-Bench, and the repo does not include the benchmark or code to reproduce them.
Use this in your AI agent
Ask your agent
Using the Deduped MCP, get the setup steps for Tongyi-MAI/Qwen-Planner-Agent and "Compare planner systems on MobilePA-Bench by category"
Add Deduped to Claude Code once
claude mcp add --transport http deduped https://dedupedai.com/mcp
Every Monday: the 5 hottest repos and exactly how to use them. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe anytime.
Get them freeShare: X LinkedIn Hacker News Email Copy link
Third-party repos we don't own. AI-written use cases can be wrong. Disclaimer