Who it is forA reviewer on a team where agents produce site changes and no one can say which agent wrote a change or why.
The problemReviewers spend time rebuilding intent from commit messages because the reasons behind agent changes are not recorded.
The outcomeEach change has a gate review record and a ledger entry that a new contributor can read without asking the author.
What you need first
- A copy of the Agent-Forge repository from GitHub
- A coding agent of your choice
- A written brief describing the site or page you want to build
- Someone available to act as an independent reviewer for the gate checks
Steps
- Open the gate checklist in /gates.
- Find the contract that the change claims to satisfy in /contracts.
- Check whether the artifact matches the contract's stated scope.
- Ask a reviewer process other than the generating agent to check the acceptance criteria.
- Hold the change until any deviation has a rationale recorded in /ledger.
Prompt for your agent
Using the Foreman Continuum repo (JamesBuciaIt3A/Agent-Forge), review the artifact at <target> against the gate questions in /gates and the contract it claims to satisfy in /contracts. Output a pass or fail answer for each gate question with a one-line reason. Verify that the reviewer did not generate the artifact.
Caveat. The README gives example gate questions but does not define a full checklist, so the gate pass criteria will need to be set by your team.
Use this in your AI agent
Ask your agent
Using the Deduped MCP, get the setup steps for JamesBuciaIt3A/Agent-Forge and "Review agent-written site changes with independent gates"
Add Deduped to Claude Code once
claude mcp add --transport http deduped https://dedupedai.com/mcp
Every Monday: the 5 hottest repos and exactly how to use them. Free, one email a week, unsubscribe anytime.
Get them freeShare: X LinkedIn Hacker News Email Copy link
Third-party repos we don't own. AI-written use cases can be wrong. Disclaimer